|
|
Editorial: Citizens Pay a High Price for Misconduct by Officials
12/05/00 - by Linn Washington Jr. - Philadelphia Tribune
PHILADELPHIA -- Good thing that a lot of public attention is focused on
the Eagles heading for the playoffs, the Sixers' sizzling start to their
season and th wrangling over building new pro-sports stadiums in
Philadelphia.
This attention on sports team successes is taking public focus off the
losing record of Philadelphia police and prosecutors for the sorry games
they've played against protesters arrested during the GOP Convention
related demonstrations this summer.
Philly's top police and prosecutors preened in the wake of snatching
over 400 protesters off city streets during the early days of the GOP
Convention.
Authorities proclaimed their success in maintaining order, vehemently
denying any misconduct in accomplishing this goal while pledging heavy
punishments for arrested members of the unruly mob.
However, the highly touted 'air-tight' cases against arrested
demonstrators trumpeted by officials a few months ago have suffocated.
Prosecutors have withdrawn numerous high-profile cases and judges have
dismissed scores of other cases, all for the same reason-- a serious lack
of evidence.
The so-called solid evidence used to arrest and charge protesters has
proven insufficient for guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
This embarrassing defeat by Philly police and prosecutors is comparable
to a sports team squandering a lead.
Included in this defeat is millions of taxpayer dollars squandered
through ineptness by City Hall.
Given the number of faulty arrests made by police during the GOP
protests, apparently much of the millions City Hall spent on Police
Department salaries for Convention related activities was misused.
Additionally, these faulty arrests, approved by overzealous prosecutors,
ate hundreds of thousands in court and prison costs... all coming out
of tax coffers.
Lawsuits for civil rights violations are inevitable given the growing
number of cases where prosecutors withdraw charges or judges dismiss
charges.
Costs for these civil rights lawsuits, from litigation to big figure
settlements and/or jury verdicts, will add millions onto the city's
mounting price tag for trying to crush constitutionally protected
dissent.
This embarrassing defeat by Philly police and prosecutors raises
disquieting questions about procedures, policies, and prejudice.
Yet, despite the high costs of these failures-- fiscally and
politically-- these disquieting questions are receiving too little
attention during the post-mortem of the outrageous misconduct by local
law enforcement.
Yes, it is appropriate to examine charges of local authorities using
excessive force and abusing procedures like imposing extraordinarily
high bails for lowly offenses.
Yes, it is appropriate to examine the arrogant refusal of authorities to
explain why they charged scores of people arrested inside of a puppet
making facility in West Philadelphia with the crime of obstructing a
highway.
Since police arrested folks inside the building, how could they
'obstruct a highway' located outside of that building. This curious
charge gives credence to the claim that police deliberately disrupted
demonstrations by arresting protesters for phony crimes.
Yes, it is appropriate to examine what happened to the sinister crimes
authorities implied when they arrested one protest leader, John Sellers,
slapping him with fourteen charges and $1 million bail.
The fact that prosecutors withdrew all charges against Sellers gives
credibility to the claim that his arrest and days in jail was a naked
preventive detention to disrupt protests his group planned.
It's certainly appropriate to examine why authorities arrested anti-GOP
demonstrators for blocking an intersection in Center City on the same
day that authorities allowed anti-Mumia Abu-Jamal demonstrators to block
intersections in South Philadelphia.
A local judge dismissed charges against the anti-GOP demonstrators after
ruling that authorities improperly prosecuted anti-GOPers for blocking
an intersection while not prosecuting the anti-Abu-Jamalers.
Unexamined so far in this embarrassing fiasco are disquieting questions
involving costly procedures regularly pursued by prosecutors.
For example, Philly prosecutors are mounting an appeal in the tragic
Miriam White case, in part to solidify their right to reject requests
from defendants to plead guilty instead of facing a trial.
If successful, this will drive up court costs by forcing jury trials on
defendants who want to plead guilty.
Another disquieting question involves prejudice.
If police and prosecutors fouled up so badly with protesters, how
reliable are their actions in other cases?
When non-whites claim innocence, prosecutors rarely drop charges for
lack of evidence and judges rarely disbelieve police despite
contradictory testimony.
A Puerto Rican man named Jose Antonio Carmona Jr. says he is serving a
life sentence based solely on flawed testimony from a Philadelphia
policeman.
The policeman testified to seeing Carmona sell drugs. The policeman said
he made this observation while standing inside of an abandoned house.
After his conviction, Carmona found proof that an elderly woman lived in
the house. She never have police permission to enter her home to
"conduct any surveillance."
A judge dismissed Carmona's appeal saying the policeman "may" have
entered the house without the woman seeing him.
This judge accepted the policeman's testimony of entering this
'abandoned' house through a rear door while rejecting the owner's
testimony that this door was sealed and couldn't be opened.
"Imagine if just one percent of the two million people currently
incarcerated in this country's prisons are innocent. Then this means
that we have 20,000 people that are languishing in prison," Carmona
stated in a letter sent to local elected officials.
Most of those arrested this summer were protesting against abuses in
America's so-called justice system.
Finally, there is a big policy question-- will officials be held
accountable for this costly and embarrassing fiasco?
- Linn Washington Jr. is an award-winning writer who teaches journalism
at Temple University.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice: All information is subject to change, it's your responsibility to confirm with R2K Legal.
|
previous r2klegal.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
About Us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate
|
|
|
|
Please help support our Legal Fund for Camille and the Timoney 3 cases. To make a donation, contact: info@r2klegal.org
|
|
|
|
Supporters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|